Share this:

Premier Mark Brantley’s recent online outburst—where he mocked a radio caller for claiming that the Special Sustainability Zone (SSZ) law grants private “sovereign states”—is a distraction from deeper problems within the legislation. The caller was wrong about sovereignty, but that does not make the SSZ amendment benign. A closer look reveals loopholes that could erode democratic oversight, threaten land rights and entrench political power.

What the amendment says

The government’s own clarification notes that any SSZ proposed in Nevis must be approved by the Nevis Island Administration (NIA). Section (2) requires the Prime Minister to consult with the NIA, makes the NIA a co‑signatory to development agreements and prohibits agreements without its prior approval. Another clause affirms that sovereign authority remains with the Federation and that private agreements cannot override the Constitution.

Why that isn’t enough

  • Insiders over citizens. The amendment does not guarantee public consultation or parliamentary debate before a zone is declared. It merely requires the NIA’s consent. When the same political party controls both the federal cabinet and the NIA, that consent risks becoming a rubber stamp. Ordinary residents are left out of the decision‑making process.
  • Ambiguous land‑acquisition powers. Although the bill reaffirms sovereignty, officials admit it allows the government to “acquire” land for SSZ projects and compensate owners. This means you may not be forced to sell your land—yet it can still be taken. The amendment sets no clear criteria or limits on when compulsory acquisition may occur, leaving property owners exposed.
  • No limits on size or number. There is no cap on how large an SSZ can be or how many may be created. One developer already stands to gain at least 500 acres (0.78 square miles) of Nevis. Without limits, vast swaths of the island could be carved into zones governed by private agreements rather than public planning laws.
  • Potential legal immunity. The content of development agreements remains secret. Other jurisdictions show that such agreements often grant investors special legal protections and tax exemptions. Without transparency, SSZs could become enclaves where normal rules do not apply.

Accountability versus arrogance

Premier Brantley’s tendency to belittle constituents’ concerns—whether about land deals, public spending or his wife’s real‑estate activities—underscores a broader issue: a leader who views scrutiny as an attack. Demanding evidence from a radio caller while refusing to disclose the details of SSZ agreements is not transparency; it is deflection. This behaviour undermines trust and raises the spectre of corruption.

What citizens can do

  • Invoke constitutional checks. If the government persists in ignoring public concerns, any elected member of the National Assembly can table a motion of no confidence. If passed and the Prime Minister does not resign or call early elections within three days, the Governor‑General must remove him.
  • Demand disclosure. Insist that proposed SSZ boundaries, developer names, compensation terms and any tax or legal exemptions be published before agreements are signed. Submit Freedom of Information requests and petition representatives for transparency.
  • Organise and vote. Collective action—protests, petitions and legal challenges—can force changes to unfair policies. Ultimately, elections remain the most powerful tool for removing leaders who dismiss the public.

Looking ahead

The SSZ framework could attract much‑needed investment, but without robust safeguards it risks turning Nevis into a patchwork of privately governed zones and further entrenching political insiders. Exposing the bill’s weaknesses is not anti‑development; it is a call for accountability. In future articles, The SKN Report will dissect additional clauses that affect land rights, compensation mechanisms and environmental protections. If you possess documents or knowledge about SSZ negotiations, we encourage you to submit tips securely.

Stay informed and take action: For more investigations and updates, visit www.thesknreport.com. If you have information or documents related to this or any other issue, www.thesknreport.com/tip-submission securely and anonymously.

Share this: